Chapter 4 of 51
The Yoruba Language
18 min read · 3,816 words
THE YORUBA LANGUAGE
The Yoruba language has been classed among the unwritten
African languages. The earliest attempt to reduce this language
into writing was in the early forties of the last century, when the
Church Missionary Society, with the immortal Rev. Henry Venn
as Secretary, organized a mission to the Yoruba country under
the leadership of one of their agents, the Rev. Henry Townsend,.
an English Clergyman then at work at Sierra Leone, and the
Rev. Samuel Ajayi Crowther, the first African Clergyman of the
C.M.S., also at work in the same place.
After several fruitless efforts had been made either to invent
new characters, or adapt the Arabic, which was already known to
Moslem Yorubas, the Roman character was naturally adopted, not
only because it is the one best acquainted with, but also because it
would obviate the difficulties that must necessarily arise if
missionaries were first to learn strange characters before they could
undertake scholastic and evangehstic work. With this as basis,
specizd adaptation had to be made for pronouncing some
words not to be found in the English or any other European
language.
The system, or rather want of system, existing among various
missionary bodies in Africa and elsewhere emphasized the need of
a fixed system of orthography. It was evidently essential for the
various bodies to agree upon certain rules for reducing iUiterate
languages into writing in Roman characters, not only because this
would facilitate co-operation, but also because it would render
books much cheaper than when separate founts of type must needs
be cast for every separate system (scientific or otherwise) that each
body may choose to adapt for one and the same purpose.
In this effort, the Committee of the C.M.S. were ably assisted
by certain philological doctors, as Professor Lee of Cambridge,
Mr. Norris of London, and notably by Professor Lepsius of BerUn,
to whom was entrusted the task of establishing a complete form
of alphabetic system to which all hitherto unwritten languages
could be adapted.
The following remarks are largely derived from the second edition
of Prof. Lepsius' work.
The Professor consulted earher efforts that had been made in
India and elsewhere to transliterate foreign (Eastern) characters
into the Roman, and out of the chaos then existing he estabUshed
on a firm scientific basis the Standard Alphabet in which the
Yoruba language is now written. This was adopted by the
C.M.S. in 1856. By this system therefore former translations had
to be transliterated under certain fixed rules.
The number of letters in the Standard Alphabet is necessarily
very large, as it was designed to meet the requirements of all
nations ; but with diacritic marks on cognate sounds and accents,
and the introduction of three characters from the Greek, the
Roman characters furnish all that is necessary from which every
unwritten language can draw.
It is very unfortunate indeed that the system has not been
faithfully followed by all, for reasons we regard as inadequate and
inconclusive. This has provoked the caustic remark of the distin-
guished philologist. Dr. R. N. Cust, that ..." no class of man-
kind is so narrowminded and opinionated as the missionary except
the linguist." For even in the Yoruba which professed to have
adopted Lepsius' Standard, certain particulars (as we shall see)
have been departed from, by no means for the better. Keen was
the controversy on these points between the English and German
missionaries of the Yoruba Mission in its early days. In the
following'pages the style commonly used in the familiar Yoruba
translations is departed from in some important particulars, as
they present some peculiar defects which ought to be rectified.
We shall endeavour to follow Professor Lepsius' Standard Alphabet
as closely as possible.
The Professor himself has conceded that shades of sound can
be adapted therefrom to meet special requirements without depart-
ing from the principles laid down. Says he in his second edition:
" The exposition of the scientific and practical principles
according to which a suitable alphabet for universal adoption in
foreign languages might be constructed has (with few exceptions
above mentioned) remained unaltered. These rules are founded
in the nature of the subject, and therefore though they may admit
of certain carefully hmited exceptions, they can undergo no change
in themselves : they serve as a defence against arbitrary proposals
which do not depend upon universal laws ; they will explain and
recommend the application which has been made of them already
to a series of languages and will serve as a guide in their application
to new ones.
"But we have not concealed from the very beginning that it
is not in every person's power to apprehend with physiological
and hnguistic accuracy the sounds in a foreign language or even
those of his own, so as to apply with some degree of certainty the
principles of our alphabet to a new system of sounds containing
its own peculiarities. A few only of our most distinguished
grammarians are possessed of a penetrating insight into the living
organisms of sounds in those very languages they have discussed ;
much less can it be expected of missionaries, who are often obliged
without previous preparation to address themselves to the reduction
and representation of a foreign language, that everything which
belongs to a correct adjudication of particular sounds (frequently
apprehended only with great difficulty even by the ear) or to
their connection with one another and with other systems of
sounds, should present itself spontaneously to their minds."
Certain rules of transcription are imperative for a correct
scientific method of procedure. Whatever may have been the
difficulties encountered in the ancient written languages, so far as
the Yoruba and other unwritten languages are concerned, the
field hes clear.
The Enghsh mode of pronouncing the vowels had to be rejected
in favour of the Italian or continental mode.
The following rules or principles have been laid down:—
1. The power of each letter as representing certain sounds as
handed down from antiquity should be retained.
2. The orthography of any language should never use (a) the
same letter for different sounds, nor (b) different letters for the
same sound.
In violation of (a) note the force of the letter g in the Enghsh
words give, gin ; of a in man, name, what ; of ea in treat, tread ;
of ei in weight, height ; of the consonants ch in archbishop, arch-
angel ; of augh in slaughter, laughter; also the sound of ch in
chamber, champagne, chameleon where the same letters are used
for different sounds.
In violation of (b) note the last syllables in the words atten/fow,
omission, fsLshion, where different letters are used for the same
sound.
3. Every simple sound is to be represented by a single sign.
This is violated by writing sh to represent the " rushing sound "
of s. This, as we shall see below, is quite unnecessary in the
Yoruba language. Here we find an application of the principle
that where a new sound is not found in the Roman alphabetic
system a diacritical mark on the nearest graphic sign should be
used. A diacritical mark therefore over s will more fitly represent
the English sound of sh. ^ This is also in accordance with the
sin and shin in the Hebrew and Arabic, where the difference
1 Publishers' Note. It must be noted, however, that in printing
this work s has been used throughout to represent the sh sound.
between the soft and the rushing sound is indicated by diacritical
points, e.g.,
Heb. to tD Arab. - ^
Again the letter A is a sign of aspiration (as the spiritus asper
in the Greek) as in it, hit ; at, hat ; owl, howl, etc. It would
therefore be unscientific to accord it a new meaning altogether
by such a use of it in violation of rule i.
Apart from this is the fact that the letter s with a diacritical
mark over it has been employed about twenty years previously
by oriental scholars transcribing Indian letters into the Roman.
4. Explosive letters are not to be used to express fricative
sounds and vice versa, e.g., the use oi ph as f where p is clearly
an explosive letter.
5. The last rule is that a long vowel should never be represented
by doubling the short. This method seems to have found favour
with some transcribers, there being no fixed system of transcription.
THE ALPHABET
In a purely scientific alphabetic system, it would seem more
correct that the alphabets be arranged according to the organ
most concerned in the pronunciation of the letters, e.g., all sounds
proceed from the fauces, and are modified either at the throat,
by the teeth, or by the lips ; hence they may be classified as
guttural, dental, or labial. But nothing is gained by altering
the order which came down to us from remote antiquity as the
Romans received it from the Greek, and these from the
Phoenicians, etc.
The Vowels.
The vowels in Yoruba may
be built upon the three funda-
mental vowels, a, i, u, with the
two subsidiary ones, e formed
by the coalescence of the first
two a and i, and o by the coal-
escence of a and u from which
we have a, e, i, o and u. These are the recognised principal
vowels and are pronounced after the Italian method (ah,
aye, ee, o, 00), but whereas in the Enghsh language the
short soimd of e is written eh and that of o as aw. these sounds,
according to the standard system in accordance with rule 3, are
represented by a dot or dash under the cognate sounds, hence we
have e and o. A complete representation of the vowels in Yoruba
therefore is as follows:—a, e, e, i, o, g, a (prpnounced ah, aye,
eh, ee, oh, aw, oo), the original taking precedence of the diacritic.
Note that u is not to be pronounced as " you " but as oo in food.
Nasalization.—The clear vowels are capable of a peculiar
alteration which is produced by uttering the vowel through the
nasal canal. There is no consonantal element brought into
play, but it is an alteration entirely within the vowel. Nasalization
is very largely used in the Yoruba, and consequently its ortho-
graphy should be free from any ambiguity. In the Standard Alpha-
bet the circumflex (~) is placed over the nasalized vowel to indicate
such a sound. Unfortunately the Yoruba as written by mission-
aries substitute the letter n for this sign, a cause of some ambiguity
in writing certain words as Akano, Akinola, Morinatu, Obimeko,
where the letter n stands between two vowels, and is liable to be
pronounced with the latter, e.g., A-ka-no, A-ld-no-la, MQ-ri-na-tu,
0-bu-ne-ko ; but following the Standard Alphabet, the words
should be written Akao, Obueko, just as the Portuguese
names are written Semao, Adao, JoSo, etc. Indeed certain
sections of the Yoruba tribes that use nasalization very
sparingly do pronounce these words as written without any sign
of nasalization. The n therefore is not only unnecessary but it
is also misleading.
In the following pages, the Standard System will be adhered to,
where such ambiguities are liable to occur: but for the sake of
simplicity and to avoid the unnecessary use of diacritical marks,
n as a nasal sign may be used where it cannot cause any ambiguity,
e.g.,
1. When it precedes a consonant as nje, ndao, nk6.
2. When it closes a word, as Awon, Basorun, Ibadan, Iseyin.
As nasahzation is said to be caused by the dropping of a nasal
consonant, such a Umited use of « as a nasal soimd may be justified.
No pure, uneducated Yoruba man can pronounce a word ending
in a consonant, he will instinctively add an i or u to it. There is
therefore no closed syllable in Yoruba, n at the end of a word is
purely nasal.
The System of Consonants
There are sixteen distinct consonantal sounds in the Yoruba
language, each having the same force and power as in the English
alphabet; they are : b, d, f, g, h, j, k, 1, m, n, p, r, s, t, w, y.
No consonants are used to represent a vowel by perverting them
from their legitimate consonantal sounds as h, w, and y are some-
times used in English.
Besides the above, there are two other sounds not represented
in the Roman or in any other European system ; they are ex-
plosive sounds peculiar to the Yoruba and alhed tribes formed by
the lip and jaw, viz., gb and kp. They are regarded as guttural
modifications of b and p, and as they appear to result from a
combination of two organs concerned in speech, but the com-
ponent parts of which are so intimately connected they are rightly
represented by two letters, though not contravening rule 3.
As to kp, since usage makes it evident that the Yorubas never
pronounce the letter p but as kp, it is therefore not considered
necessary to include kp in the Yoruba alphabet as is done in the
Ibo ; the simple p does perform its duty satisfactorily.
Here we find a fit application of Professor Lepsius' remarks
that " The general alphabet, when applied to particular languages,
must be capable of simplification as well as of enlargement. All
particular diacritical marks are unnecessary in those languages
where none of the bases have a double value ; we then write the
simple base without a diacritical mark. Where two sounds
belong to the same base, one only of the signs will be wanted. ..."
This is well exemplified here. We therefore write p and not kp
in Yoruba.
The same may be said of the letter s and the sound sh, referred
to above. The difference is indicated in the Standard Alphabet
by a diacritical mark, e.g., s, s (for sh). The Yorubas can safely
dispense with the latter, and for the sake of simplicity this ought
to have been done, as no difference as to the meaning of a word
is suggested by the same word being pronounced soft or harsh.
And more also because in some parts of the country, notably the
Ekun Osi district (the most northerly), the harsh sound is un-
pronounceable, whatever may be written ; e.g., shall, shop, will
be pronounced sail, sop. In the Epo district, on the other hand,
it is just the reverse ; the harsh sound will be pronounced instead
of the soft, thus same, son will be pronounced shame, shon.
But all over the country women and children invariably use
the softer sound for the same word, which, if thus used by men is
considered affectations, except in the Ekun Osi district, where the
purest and most elegant Yoruba is spoken.
S (for sh) therefore might have been dropped from the Yoruba
alphabet with no harm resulting ; it is, however, retained because
over a great part of the country a distinction is made between
the two sounds ; apart from the fact that it would often be
required in representing the sounds of some words of foreign origin.
From the above modifications therefore we have the Yoruba
alphabet as now used:—
abdeefggbhijklmnooprsstuwy .
Accents or Tones
An accent in the accepted sense of the term denotes the stress
laid upon a particular syllable, be it the ultimate, penultimate
or antepenultimate syllable of a word. In Yoruba it is used
differently. What are called accents, and for which the usual
symbols are used are really tones, of which there are three: the
elevated, the middle and the depressed ; for the first and the
last the acute and the grave accents are used respectively, the
middle tone in its simplest form requires no accent sign.
In Yoruba, vowels are of greater importance than consonants,
and tones than vowels ; hence the peculiarity of this language,
that musical sounds can be employed to convey a correct idea
of words in speech.
Another error into which those responsible for the present mode
of writing Yoruba have fallen, by departing from the Standard
System, is the introduction of the circumflex (~) and its indiscrimi-
nate use as a sign of a so-called long vowel.
There are really no long or short vowels in Yoruba as under-
stood in the English language ; what appears to be long is the
coalescence of two or more vowels with an elision of the inter-
vening consonants, e.g., Bale is a contraction of Baba-ile, i.e.
father (or master) of the house. Here the second h is dropped, the
two a's coalesce, and the i is absorbed in them, being represented
by a prolongation of the tone. The vowels are therefore simple
and compound.
The meaning of a word varies as the tone, e.g., we may say :—
ba ba, bk, the voice being raised, even or depressed respectively.
The first ba means to meet, the second ba to he in ambush, and
the third hk to ahght upon.
So we may have be, be, b^ : b§ means to split open, be to be
officious, and b^ to beg.
Also bu, bu, bu: bu means to abuse, bu to be mouldy, and
bu to cut open.
In this way each vowel with each tone accent may be combined
with each of the consonants to form words of different meanings ;
or in other words, thus may every consonant be used with each
of the vowels in turn, forming different words by varying the
tone.
The Use of the Accents
To this method of using the accents over the vowels Professor
Lepsius made the strongest objections, as by such a use the accents
have been diverted from their proper uses to serve another purpose.
He therefore proposed to place the tone accents to the right-hand
side of the vowel instead of over it, so as to distinguish a word
accent from a tone accent, as is done in the Chinese and other
cognate languages: e.g., word accent would be written ba, bk;
tone accent, ba, ba\
In this proposal the professor agrees with the Rev. T. J. Bowen
an American Baptist Missionary in his Yoruba Grammar and
Dictionary published in 1858 by the Smithsonian Institution.
But Crowther—a Yoruba man—did not in his grammar make any
such distinction. He thinks the existing accents will do well
enough, and for the best of reasons, there is no word accent in
Yoruba, the tone governs everything, and Europeans cannot speak
without a word accent.
The language moreover abounds in contractions and elisions,
a whole syllable may be dropped but the tone remains. This is
the crux of difficulty with foreigners trying to speak the language,
and to what extent they are able to overcome this, to that extent
their Yoruba is said to be perfect.
Combination of the Accents
As remarked above, there are no closed syllables in the Yoruba
language, every syllable must end in a vowel and every vowel
must be one of the three tones represented by the accents. Words
of three or four syllables are often contracted into two, the
coalescence of the tones forming the compound vowels.
The entire scheme of the accents or tones may be thus repre-
sented:—
I. Simple vowels with the varied tones.
a, in which the tone is raised: as ka, to pick ; ba, to meet;
la, to lick,
a, in which the tone is even : as pa, to kill; ba, to ambush ;
ta, to kick.
a, in which the tone is depressed : as rk, to buy ; ki, to count;
fa, to draw.
II. Compound vowels in which a single vowel bears more
than one tone :—
A. Compounds of the raised tone,
a, in which the raised tone is doubled, e.g., A'yan, contracted
from Arfyan, i.e., cares, worries.
4-, in which the raised tone is combined with the middle, e.g.,
Ki-nla from Kinila—a form of exclamation.
& in which the raised tone is combined with the depressed,
e.g., beni from b^h^ni, so it is.
B. Compounds of the middle tone.
a' in which the middle tone is combined with the raised ; e.g.
A'yan from a-hayan, a cockroach ; O'ri from Oriri, a tomb,
a" in which the middle tone is combined with itself, e.g., Ta'ni
from Ta-ha-ni—who is it ?
a' in which the middle tone is combined with the depressed,
e.g., E"ru from eriru, spice ; kere from keh^rg, a screen.
C Compounds of the depressed tone.
k' in which the depressed tone is combined with the raised,
e.g., a'nu from cini-inu, mercy; 6'to from 6tit6, truth.
k- in which the depressed tone is combined with the middle,
e.g., ko"'^^ from kdriko, a wolf.
i' in which the depressed tone is combined with itself, e.g.,
Ori contracted from Oriri, black plum.
In this way words of four or five syllables may, by elision and
absorption, be contracted into two or three ; e.g., «ifin from
aw6fin, the palace ; hence Alafin from Ani-k-w^-fin, Lord of the
royal palace.
0-oni fromOw6ni, which is itself a contraction of Omo oliiw^ni,
son of a sacrificial victim.
The consonants may be dropped, the vowels absorbed, but the
tones are always preserved ; the first and last syllables only are
essential, the voice can gUde over all the intervening tones for
the sake of shortness.
This is at once the chief characteristic and—to foreigners—the
main difficulty of the Yoruba language. In order to avoid such
complicated tone accents it would be preferable to write out the
words in full, although the contracted form may be used in
speaking or reading, e.g., otito for 6'to ; korik6 for k6"'"''
Words similar in form, distinguished only by their tones.
Words of two syllables:—
Api
. the arm
Ina
.. fire, louse
Apa
. a prodigal
Ink
.. flogging
Apa
. a scar
Lia
.. a tattoo mark
Aid
. a riddle
Idi
.. the eagle
A15
. something ground
\di
.. the seat
Alo
• going
Idi
.. bunch of fruit
Awo
. a dish
llii
.. a town
Aw6
. a crash
m
.. a drum
Aw6
.. a fishing net
llu
.. a gimlet
Awo
. a guinea-fowl
Awo
.. a secret
Agba .. a rope lya
Agba .. an elder lya
Agba .. a cannon lya
A'yan .. anxiety, care Ik6
A'yan .. a cockroach Ik6
A'yan .. a hardwood Ikd
Baba .. father Ori
Baba (adv.) quite full Ori
Bkbk .. guinea corn 6ri
Epo .. palm oil 0p6
Epo .. bark Op6
Ep6 .. weeds Opd
E'ri .. corn chaff Oko
E'ri .. dirt Okg
Eri (for Ori) the head 6k6
Words of three syllables similarly
Apata .. a rock korfko
Apata .. a shield k6rik6
Apatk .. a butcher
a mother
punishment
a separation
a cough
a state messenger
a hook or hanging
the head
shea butter
black plum
a post
a widow
to be busy
a husband
a hoe
a spear
distinguished:—
grass
wolf
Words of four syllables.
Koldkdlo .. stealthily
Kolgkolo .. circuitously
K^16kolo .. muddy, miry
K616k^l6 .. the fox